The human rights framework

 

Contents:
Objectives
Method

Timing

Materials

Preparation

Activities

Handouts:
Handout 5.1
Handout 5.2
Handout 5.3
Handout 5.4

Handout 5.5
Handout 5.6

Readings:
Reading 5.1
Reading 5.2

Presentation:
PowerPoint: The human rights framework

 

Objectives

At the end of this session, participants should be able to:

  • explain which the main sources of human rights law and what the main human rights instruments are;

  • name some of the mechanisms in place to implement and enforce human rights law;

  • name the main human rights bodies;

  • clarify how human rights law applies in armed conflicts and states of emergencies;

  • list the main criteria for the situations in which only the most basic human rights apply.

Method

Presentation/lecture
Individual work
Reading
Group work
Small group work

Timing

Approximately 3 hours

Materials

PowerPoint Slides or Overhead Transparencies 5.1 to 5.16
Handout 5.1: "International human rights instruments"
Handout 5.2: "International protection of human rights"
Handout 5.3: "Exercise on human rights mechanisms"
Handout 5.4: "Exercise on CCPR and emergencies"
Handout 5.5: "International and regional human rights frameworks"
Handout 5.6: "The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights"
Reading 5.1: "Human rights instruments: limitations, remedies, mechanisms"
Reading 5.2: "Derogations during states of emergency"
Video projector for PowerPoint presentation, or overhead transparency projector

Preparation

Photocopy the handouts and readings for distribution to all participants. Prepare for the PowerPoint or overhead transparency presentation.

Activities

Activity 1
(5 minutes)
Introduce the session objectives using Overhead Transparency 5.1.

Activity 2
(60 minutes)
With the help of Overhead Transparencies 5.2 to 5.7, explain the following:

Human rights yesterday and today

The idea of rights dates back to pre-Second World War domestic constitutions, but in modern time and for our purposes it starts with the UN Charter, which in its preamble declares as a primary purpose of the United Nations:

"promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion."

(Overhead Transparencies 5.2 et 5.3)

The human rights instruments and context have developed a great deal since the end of the Second World War. Human rights are no longer within the domestic jurisdiction of the state because of the fact that states have signed onto a large number of legal instruments where they give up their sovereignty to a certain extent. In this way, human rights have become a legitimate concern to the international community. They are being discussed in political fora all the time, and states are reporting on their efforts to respect and implement human rights to various bodies. In signing on to international human rights treaties, states give away some of their sovereignty and make themselves vulnerable to be scrutinized by the international community.

The idea of international human rights was to internationalize human rights and make them known to all people. It was not to replace domestic protection of individuals, but to make the protection of human rights more effective within national systems. When a state has ratified a treaty, it is obliged to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that the treaty is implemented at national level. This can be done either through implementing legislation which corresponds to the subject matter dealt with in the treaty, or through making the treaty directly applicable in the domestic legal system. This is important to note because if the domestic legal system has implemented and made applicable international human rights law, then remedies can be sought through the domestic system.

(Overhead Transparency 5.4)

The International Bill of Human Rights

The International Bill of Human Rights contains the following instruments:

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948

  • The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR), 1966

  • The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), 1966

(Overhead Transparency 5.4; refer back to Session 3 on International Law, in particular Reading 3.1 which mentions the CCPR)

The first development on the international arena was the adoption in 1948 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Antecedents to these important instruments were minority treaties adhered to on bilateral or multilateral bases, the Charter of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg, as well as international humanitarian law which was developed much earlier.

Although the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was not intended to contribute to legal developments but was adopted by the UN General Assembly as a "common standard of achievement", it was a giant step forward in terms of bringing human rights onto the international arena. It is important to remember that the UDHR is not a treaty. However, today, many of its provisions have become part of international customary law. The Universal Declaration was then codified with the adoption of two Covenants in 1966: the CCPR, and the CESCR. It is interesting to note that while the UDHR covered the whole range of rights, it was not possible to agree on one instrument when the rights were to be codified into legally binding law.

The two covenants are different in nature because of the different type of rights that each addresses. Some refer to the CCPR as having "negative" rights and the CESCR as having "positive" rights. The terms "positive" and "negative" are not value statements, but indicate that as far as negative rights go, states have to refrain from certain actions, and with regard to positive rights, they have to take certain (positive) action. The CCPR contains rights such as freedom of movement and expression, religion and conscience. The CESCR contains rights which should be progressively achieved by the contracting states, for example the right to work, social security, adequate food, clothing and housing.

(Overhead Transparency 5.5)

Other major human rights instruments

It is important to be aware of the different human rights instruments that exist as a prerequisite for being able to draw upon the provisions that can be found in these instruments. For our purposes it is particularly important to know, apart from the International Bill of Human Rights, the instruments that have a monitoring body in form of a Committee:

  • The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), 1965

  • The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 1979

  • The Convention against Torture (CAT), 1984

  • The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989

In this context it is also important to remember the following instrument, for which the "monitoring body" is the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR):

  • The Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its Protocol, 1951 and 1967

(Overhead Transparency 5.7)

Distribute Handout 5.1: "International human rights instruments" and Handout 5.2: "International protection of human rights". Explain that these handouts contain the information you just covered in your presentation.

Activity 3
(20 minutes)
Ask participants to turn to page 4 of the handout. Give them five minutes to complete the exercise individually.

Ask for volunteers to share their answers in plenary.

Individual work

Mark if the following statements are true or false, or answer the questions:

1. The idea of rights started with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

True

False

2. When a state has ratified an international human rights treaty, it is supposed to either make that treaty domestic law or implement it through legislation.

True

False

3. Which instruments form the International Bill of Human Rights?

4. The Universal Declaration covered civil and political, as well as economic, social and cultural rights.

True

False

5. The four other human rights instruments apart from the CCPR and the CESCR which have treaty monitoring bodies (Committees) are as follows:

 

Answer key

1. False; 2. True; 3. The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, The Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights; 4. True; 5. The Convention against Torture, The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, The Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Activity 4
(10 minutes)
Distribute Reading 5.1: "Human rights instruments: limitations, remedies, mechanisms". Give participants ten minutes for silent reading.

Activity 5
(40 minutes)
Distribute Handout 5.3: "Exercise on human rights mechanisms". Ask participants to reflect individually on the first part of the exercise regarding treaties that their country has signed and ratified. Then, request that they work in their groups to complete the group work. They have 15 minutes.

Individual work

It is important that you are aware which human rights treaties and optional protocols are applicable in the country you are working in in order to be able to use these instruments and the treaty bodies in your advocacy work.

  • Do you know which treaties your country has signed and ratified?

Group work

The Committee on the Rights of the Child is the monitoring body of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, created by the treaty. The Committee is comprised of independent experts who serve in their individual capacity.

Article 45 of the Convention provides for international co-operation, and appoints UNICEF as one of the agencies which may be represented at the considerations of state reports before the Committee. Under Article 45, UNICEF and other agencies are authorized to submit reports on the implementation of the Convention in areas falling within the scope of their activities.

The praxis developed by the Committee on the Rights of the Child is that it will consider the reports received from states parties in an informal session, called a pre-sessional working group, without the state party’s presence, to hear the views of and comments by international organizations and NGOs. It will then use that information in its discussions with the state.

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of this procedure?

  • What type of information do you think could be passed on to the Committee?

 

Answer key

It is important to point out that this exercise contains new and important information about the work of one monitoring body in the international human rights system, namely the Committee on the Rights of the Child. Refer to Reading 5.1, which contains general information about treaty-based mechanisms. In the discussion it would be important to highlight some of the following advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages

The Committee provides a forum for discussion on human rights issues, in which it is possible to raise sensitive issues with governments. As the Committee is not an operational body with presence on the ground, asking the Committee to raise issues on behalf of agencies that do not want to put at stake their action on the ground may be a good option.

The Committee is a forum that focuses very much on a human rights protection context at the national level, and it is therefore an excellent opportunity to address issues relating to lacking or insufficient legislative frameworks as well as implementation of existing legislation by the judiciary.

Disadvantages

The monitoring bodies are extremely slow in reviewing state reports as they are lacking resources and staff. It may therefore not be the most appropriate human rights mechanism in raising human rights concerns that urgently need to be addressed.

The observations adopted by the Committee are only recommendations and have little or no legally binding force. However, states do take the recommendations seriously and make efforts to improve the human rights situation as a result of the deliberations before the Committee.

Type of information to be shared with the Committee

It will generally pose no problem to forward general information about the human rights situation to the Committee. That is why it is so suitable to raise concerns regarding the protection context (such as review or implementation of legislation) rather than specific incidents or cases. Information about individual cases could only be passed on to the Committee if you can ensure safety and physical protection of the person(s) in question, and if raising the individual case drives a greater interest than just that of the individual case. For example, a specific case of a child in detention may be raised to address the need to change detention procedures in that country.

Activity 6
(30 minutes)
Distribute Reading 5.2: "Derogations during states of emergency" and Handout 5.4: "Exercise on CCPR and emergencies". Give participants five minutes to read; then ask them to turn to a neighbour and to complete the exercise in Handout 5.3. You may also make a presentation using overhead transparencies 5.9 to 5.12. after you have allowed some time for reading the handout, as the issue of derogations is rather complex.

Small group work

The fact that a state has made an official proclamation of a state of emergency does not always mean that the international community also treats the situation as an emergency. Some states are using the possibility to derogate as an excuse not to be criticized on the international level for not being able to live up to their obligations under the CCPR.

  • Are you aware of situations of this kind? Please list some examples.

  • What can be done to address this particular dilemma?

 

Ask for volunteers to share their answers in plenary.

Answer key

The participants may be able to cite examples where the country has not made a proclamation, or the criteria for derogating are not fulfilled. Focus the discussion on how to address this dilemma. Various approaches can be taken and participants should brainstorm on these issues.

The following are some examples:

  • Raising the issue in the Human Rights Committee, other treaty bodies and other human rights mechanisms.

  • Making sure that during any high level visit, the issue is on the agenda.

  • Providing information to the media about the situation.

  • Meeting with government officials and exploring ways of lifting the proclamation of a state of emergency.

Activity 7
(20 minutes)
Use Overhead Transparencies 5.13 to 5.16 to make the following presentation:

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

The broad mandate of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) was created by the General Assembly resolution of 20 December 1993. The responsibilities of the High Commissioner, as the current High Commissioner Mary Robinson stated in a recent speech, are to "adopt and to foster a rights based approach across the whole spectrum of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights, to promote and protect the realization of the right to development and to specifically include women’s rights as human rights."

The Office of the High Commissioner is also present in a number of countries and carries out monitoring and advocacy activities there. At the time of writing, Burundi, Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia are the main field operations, but the Office also has field offices in Georgia, Cambodia, Colombia, Gaza, Malawi, Mongolia, and DR of the Congo and Sierra Leone.

It is important for UNICEF to coordinate its work in the field of monitoring and reporting with the Office of the High Commissioner. This because the staff of the UNHCHR have great knowledge of the human rights framework and they are specialized in monitoring and reporting on the situation of human rights.

(Overhead Transparencies 5.13 and 5.14)

Regional human rights instruments

You should be aware that there are three regional human rights treaties in addition to the international framework. Regional human rights treaties exist in Africa, the Americas and Europe. The respective treaties are the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (1981), the American Convention on Human Rights (1969) and the European Convention for the Protection of Human rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950). There are also a number of other human rights instruments on the regional level covering certain groups of people or certain issues. As far as children are concerned there are two particularly important regional treaties, namely the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (adopted in 1990 but not yet in force) and the European Convention on the Exercise of Children’s Rights (adopted in 1996 but not yet in force).

Normally, a regional treaty will provide more specific provisions and it may therefore be more useful. Depending on your concerns, you should check the different instruments at your disposal as they may have different language and sometimes they may even cover different subject matters. To exemplify the first type of differences, it could be mentioned that the American Convention in Article 4(1) in speaking of a right to life, grants that right "from the moment of conception". No other human rights treaty is as far-reaching in providing for a right to life. Another example would be Article 20 in the African Charter, which presents some strong language on the right to self-determination and peoples’ right to existence compared to other human rights treaties. With regard to the second type where a regional treaty may cover a completely different subject matter, reference could be made to Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the European Convention, which speak of an entitlement to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.

The guiding principle in connection to any conflicting or contradicting treaty provisions, is that the provision which grants the greatest amount of protection to the individual should apply.

(Overhead Transparencies 5.15 and 5.16)

Distribute Handout 5.5: "International and regional human rights frameworks" and Handout 5.6: "The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights". Explain that Handout 5.5 contains the information you just covered in your presentation, and that Handout 5.6 clarifies the mandate of the UNHCHR.

Activity 8
(5 minutes)
Refer to the session objectives on Overhead Transparency 5.1 to wrap up the session.