|
|

Humanitarian principles
Session
2:
Handout
2.2
Three
of the fundamental humanitarian principles
Humanitarian
principles are based on the work of the Red Cross, and they have their
underpinnings in international humanitarian law. The principles are
a type of framework for how we act, a "code of conduct" for
everyone present in a complex emergency, including the warring parties.
Below is a
description, in human rights terminology, of three of the humanitarian
principles that we want to focus on during this workshop.
-
First:
-THE HUMANITARIAN IMPERATIVE: to prevent and alleviate suffering;
to protect life and health (improve human condition); and to ensure
respect for the human being. It implies a right to receive humanitarian
assistance and a right to offer it as fundamental to humanitarian
principles. The humanitarian imperative also implies an over all
protection approach, i.e. the respect of international humanitarian
law and human rights.
-
Second:
-NEUTRALITY: not to take sides in the hostilities or in controversies
based on political, racial, religious or ideological identity (non-partisanship/independence).
Transparency and openness are key issues to keep neutrality. For
an organization, which has human rights principles at its core,
neutrality does not imply, however, that behind an argument of wanting
to stay neutral the organization could decide to take no action
at all in response to human rights violations. Neutrality for an
organization that has taken on a rights-based approach must therefore
not be an obstacle to tackling human rights violations.
-
Third:
-IMPARTIALITY: aid is delivered to all those who are suffering,
the guiding principle is only their need and the corresponding right.
Human rights are the basis and the framework for an assessment of
needs. The idea is, based on our definition of protection, that
depending on which right are to be fulfilled (for example, the right
to health or the right to a fair trial), the aid community should
respond with the appropriate assistance, advocacy and action. Accordingly,
this principle can include both the proportionality to need
as well as the principle of non-discrimination. Proportionality
to the need also reflects accountability of the aid community to
the victims as well as to donors. It is crucial to emphasize state
responsibility in the context of ensuring that aid is delivered
in an impartial way.
|
Group
work
Discuss
the following:
-
Is
it possible to have, for example, impartial delivery of aid,
but being partisan as a humanitarian actor?
|
|